Our "extant" product supports AUTH-RES for DKIM and ADSP.  Without a 
thorough review again and confirmation, I feel, unfortunately, probably 
not 100% according your specification. At the time it was implemented, 
over a few years ago, I had found it inadequate to cover all bases. I do 
recall it was mentioned.  I think this may be ADSP only.   When no MFA 
(Mail Filter Agent) standards, and AFAIK, no one is filtering on this 
stuff, I didn't think it passed all the information necessary for a 
future MFA.

Example, a record for triple signatures via a list submission.

Authentication-Results: dkim.winserver.com;
         dkim=pass header.d=ietf.org header.s=ietf1 header.i=ietf.org;
         adsp=fail policy=unknown author.d=resistor.net signer.d=ietf.org 
(unauthorized signer);
         dkim=fail (DKIM_BODY_HASH_MISMATCH) header.d=opendkim.org 
header.s=mail2010 header.i=opendkim.org;
         adsp=fail policy=unknown author.d=resistor.net signer.d=opendkim.org 
(unauthorized signer);
         dkim=fail (DKIM_SIGNATURE_BAD_BUT_TESTING) header.d=resistor.net 
header.s=mail header.i=@resistor.net;
         adsp=pass policy=unknown author.d=resistor.net signer.d=resistor.net 
(originating signer);



On 3/22/2013 12:54 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> Colleagues,
>
> (with apologies for the cross-posting if you get more than one copy of this)
>
> As you may have seen already, I'm working on a revision to RFC5451.
>
> A Proposed Standard "bis" effort always benefits from describing extant
> implementations.  I know about the ones I've written, and about some
> very public uses of it (Gmail, Yahoo, for example).  If there's anyone
> in this audience that knows of others, I'd love to hear about it.
>
> Reviews of the update are also welcome:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kucherawy-rfc5451bis/
>
> Thanks,
> -MSK
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
> http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
>

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

Reply via email to