On 10/20/2013 3:55 PM, Dave Crocker wrote: > On 10/20/2013 3:50 PM, Tony Hansen wrote: >> Perhaps, if this document is ever cracked open again, it would be useful >> to tag things better to make it painfully obvious what is being >> discussed. For example, >> >> v= [Signature] Version (plain-text; REQUIRED) ... > > > Within the definition text, perhaps. > > However we could develop a referential norm, independent of that, and > then call for its use whenever docs are modified. Something like the > email header naming convention would make sense. > > Hence: > > Signature.v = > > Key.h =
Use a "-" and I agree completely with this naming convention: Signature-v = Key-h = (Rulenames can use a hyphen, but not a period.) Tony _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html