On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 10:25 AM, Barry Leiba <barryle...@computer.org> wrote:
> >>Murray, Tony, or someone else: Can you independently check that these > >>examples need the extra space in order to be verified correctly? > > > > Murray did that for us a decade ago -- it's one of the test cases that > opendkim uses. > > Yes, but the point is: did Murray (or anyone) extract the text *from > the published RFC* and use that as input? That is apparently what > Simon did, which resulted in this report. > It looks to me like this was some loss of precision in the transition from RFC4871 to RFC6376. The former has six spaces, and the latter has five. I very likely didn't change my test suite in between, or re-test the examples in RFC6376 before it shipped. -MSK
_______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
