the DKIM library.  If it passes a v=2 signature to a library that only
 knows about v=1, the library will say it's invalid, which isn't ideal but
 isn't wrong.

the code that tests for the v= parameter could, just as easily, check for the presence of the new features.

Huh?  v=1 code doesn't know what the new features would be.

Regards,
John Levine, jo...@iecc.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies",
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

Reply via email to