2001 A Space Odyssey http://www.strafe.com/2001/ http://www.networksorcery.com/enp/rfc/rfc25.txt "Because it may be desirable to reserve one or more link numbers for instrumentation purposes, and because 256 link numbers are many more than are needed, we suggest that no link number over 63 be used. At UCLA, we will implement our tables to take advantage of this limitation. We also note that 32 may be even more realistic, but 64 is certainly sufficient." ------------- Request for Comment - RFC-2001-06-24-000 - 2001 A Space Odyssey Are 3 digits sufficient for the RFC-YYYY-MM-DD-xxx Numbering Plan ? 000-999 vs. some binary limit like 64... These RFCs can then be linked from 2D Space to 3D Space to help people migrate from FlatLand. http://www.FlatLand.com Jim Fleming http://www.unir.com Mars 128n 128e http://www.unir.com/images/architech.gif http://www.unir.com/images/address.gif http://www.unir.com/images/headers.gif http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/130dftmail/unir.txt http://msdn.microsoft.com/downloads/sdks/platform/tpipv6/start.asp http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/ietf/Current/msg12213.html http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/ietf/Current/msg12223.html
