Micah, Micah Beck wrote: > > I would suggest to the advocates of the OPES working group that they > reconsider the modification I suggested to the charter a while ago, and > which generated almost no discussion: > > Modify > > "Intermediary services provided in this way are not > transparent: They have to be authorized by either the > content requestor or the provider, corresponding to > who the service being provided for." > > to read > > "Intermediary services provided in this way are not > transparent: They have to be authorized by the provider." > I disagree. It isn't acceptable to remove the requestor from the authorization loop in the general case. Brian
- Re: OPES charter proposal again. Paul Hoffman / IMC
- Re: OPES charter proposal again. Michael W. Condry
- Re: OPES charter proposal again. Brian E Carpenter
- Re: OPES charter proposal again. Michael W. Condry
- Re: OPES charter proposal again. Michael W. Condry
- Re: OPES charter proposal again. Michael W. Condry
- Re: OPES charter proposal again. James P. Salsman
- Re: OPES charter proposal again. Dave Crocker
- Re: OPES charter proposal again. Michael W. Condry
- Re: OPES charter proposal again. Micah Beck
- RE: OPES charter proposal again. Brian E Carpenter
- RE: OPES charter proposal again. Tomlinson, Gary
- RE: OPES charter proposal again. Ian Cooper
- Re: OPES charter proposal again. Lee Rafalow