2012/2/13 Hannes Tschofenig <[email protected]>: > Hey Ted, > > yes, I should have been more precise. > > Here is the current definition of "unlinkable sessions": > > Definition: The term "unlinkable session" refers the ability of the > system to render a set of actions by a subject unlinkable from one > another over a sequence of protocol runs (sessions). > > This definition talks about the "system" and it should rather talk about > eavesdroppers instead. > Better wording may also be needed since I just created it when I updated the > most recent draft version and I couldn't really find something else that > worked nicely. >
If you updated to say "render a set of actions by a subject unlinkable by either party or eavesdroppers over a sequence of protocol runs (sessions)", does that meet your intent? Or do you mean a more limited form? Note that when I think about the subject've view as a party, the property I expect is that the subject knows that they are linked, but could not prove it based on data from the protocol sessions. regards, Ted Hardie _______________________________________________ ietf-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-privacy
