I agree, obfuscation is perhaps not the formal approach we should take to such offerings. Asking users to encrypt to protect privacy is also onerous on users and may interfere with the management of networks where DPI 'could' be an appropriate and justifiable use.
I would also offer that privacy considerations 'should' be designed into the operation of systems such as we are discussing. But as privacy is a social construct and therefore subjective it's a tad challenging for a technical community. That does not mean we should not engage in this area though. Bryan On 11/12/2012 07:35, "Fred Baker (fred)" <[email protected]> wrote: >If you want privacy, encrypt your traffic. Smoke screens mostly make >people work a little harder - not only the folks you're trying to >interdict, but the people you want to help. >_______________________________________________ >ietf-privacy mailing list >[email protected] >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-privacy _______________________________________________ ietf-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-privacy
