At 10:11 PM +0100 8/10/07, Stephen Farrell wrote:
But, your main point is correct - if there are people with real non-x.509 use cases they really should speak up now before a WG is chartered (or re-chartered).
In addition to Thomas' long list, I would add "items directly signed by the TA with no intervening certificates". This would likely include the TA instructions themselves, but it also includes various authorization instructions.
--Paul Hoffman, Director --VPN Consortium
