*> *> I'll grant FTP an exemption, it came well before NAT units became *> prevalent (Was there an FTP-over-NCP before The Great IP Deployment?). There certainly was. FTP and Telnet were both ARPANET NCP protocols in use since ~1972. Bob Braden *> However, I do agree that anybody designing a protocol in the last 3-4 *> years *should* have designed it to be firewall and NAT friendly. *> (Yes, I know that can be difficult in practice. I guess that's today's *> "Welcome to Reality"). *> *> Valdis Kletnieks *> Operating Systems Analyst *> Virginia Tech *> *>
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations inf... Tony Dal Santo
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocation... John Day
- Re: IP network address assignments/alloca... Mark Atwood
- Re: IP network address assignments/al... John Day
- Application name space and ASN.1 ... Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: Application name space a... John Day
- Re: IP network address assignments/alloca... Thomas Narten
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations inf... Pyda Srisuresh
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations inf... Pyda Srisuresh
- RE: IP network address assignments/allocations inf... Bob Braden
- RE: IP network address assignments/allocations inf... Melinda . Shore
- RE: IP network address assignments/allocations inf... Ian King
- RE: IP network address assignments/allocations inf... Tony Hain (Exchange)
- RE: IP network address assignments/allocation... Paul Ferguson
- Re: IP network address assignments/alloca... Jon Crowcroft
- Re: IP network address assignments/al... Perry E. Metzger
- Re: IP network address assignment... Yakov Rekhter
- Re: IP network address assignment... Brian E Carpenter
- Re: IP network address assig... Perry E. Metzger
- Re: IP network address a... Randy Bush