Re: To address or NAT to address?

[Brian E Carpenter]

"David R. Conrad" wrote:
> 
> Christian,
> 
> > Increasing our reliance on the DNS is definitely not a good idea.
> 
> Hmmm.  This would appear to be the exact opposite of what the IETF has done
> with IPv6.
> 
> Rgds,
> -drc

Well now. There is some truth in that (A6 records are quite complex...)
but NAT has generated some serious and complex dependencies on DNS too,
not to mention various load sharing techniques.

  Brian