> And remember, if we ever need to, we can start subnetting the bottom > 64 bits, at the loss of one form of stateless autoconf (which I'm > starting to find, in deployment, is too unpleasant to use on my nets anyway). Ugh. Ick. You're not wrong, of course, but just ... "Yecchh."
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations inf... Keith Moore
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations inf... Perry E. Metzger
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations inf... Ed Gerck
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations inf... Keith Moore
- Gateways (Re: IP network address assignments/alloc... Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: Gateways (Re: IP network address assignments/a... Ed Gerck
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations inf... Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations inf... Daniel Senie
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations inf... Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations inf... Perry E. Metzger
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations inf... Matt Crawford
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations inf... Tripp Lilley
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations inf... Perry E. Metzger
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations inf... Tripp Lilley
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations inf... Keith Moore
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations inf... John Stracke
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations inf... Matt Holdrege
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations inf... Keith Moore
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations inf... Bill Manning
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations inf... Tripp Lilley
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations inf... Brian E Carpenter