[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Given that RFC2267 is over 2 years old now, what *do* you suggest the network > community at large do to motivate the sites that still haven't > implemented it? I think a simple motivation is appearing on the horizon. Lawyers are revving up their word processors as we speak. I mean, here are all these nice, deep-pocketed public companies that aren't taking an action they fully know could reduce risk for third parties, and even saying in public how it costs too much. Can you say "negligence suit nirvana"? I knew you could. As much as I hate the lawsharks, every once in a while they do some good in motivating change. Perry
- Re: Internet SYN Flooding, sp... Stephen Kent
- Re: Internet SYN Flooding, spoofing attacks Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: Internet SYN Flooding, spoofing attacks Paul Ferguson
- Re: Internet SYN Flooding, spoofing attack... Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: Internet SYN Flooding, spoofing at... Daniel Senie
- Re: Internet SYN Flooding, spoofing attack... Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
- Re: Internet SYN Flooding, spoofing at... Robert Elz
- Re: Internet SYN Flooding, spoofin... Charles E. Perkins
- Re: Internet SYN Flooding, sp... Paul Ferguson
- Re: Internet SYN Flooding, sp... Daniel Senie
- Re: Internet SYN Flooding, spoofing attacks Perry E. Metzger
- Re: Internet SYN Flooding, spoofing attacks John Stracke
- Re: Internet SYN Flooding, spoofing attacks Paul Ferguson
- Re: Internet SYN Flooding, spoofing attack... Vijay Gill
- Re: Internet SYN Flooding, spoofing at... Paul Ferguson
- Re: Internet SYN Flooding, spoofin... Vijay Gill
- Re: Internet SYN Flooding, sp... Paul Ferguson
- Re: Internet SYN Flooding... Mark Prior
- Re: Internet SYN Flooding, spoofin... Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: Internet SYN Flooding, sp... Paul Ferguson
- Re: Internet SYN Flooding, spoofin... Mark Prior