Re: Question re: an Internet-Draft and testing/deployment

[Valdis . Kletnieks]

On Wed, 16 Feb 2000 09:57:45 PST, Paul Hoffman / IMC <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  said:
> The note shouldn't be needed, given the definition of an Internet Draft, 
> but it appears that many folks have forgotten that definition.

Ahh.. <enlightment occurs>.  I was reading it as being even *more*
cautionary than the usual paranoia that should be created just from
its I-D status.  If the intent was just to remind people "Hey, it's
just an I-D, don't do this unless you're testing it", that's another
story.

/Valdis