Hi Patrik, Patrik Fältström wrote: > > At 17.29 -0700 2000-04-07, Peter Deutsch wrote: > > LD is intended to sit in front of a cluster of > >cache engines containing similar data, performing automatic > >distribution of incoming requests among the multiple caches. It does > >this by intercepting the incoming IP packets intended for a specific > >IP address and multiplexing it among the caches. > > What you are doing is giving a product to the service provider, which > is the one which owns the services which you load balance between. > > In the case of a transparent proxy which is discussed in this thread, > the interception is done neither by the service provider (i.e. CNN or > whoever) nor by the customer, and neither of them are informed about > what is happening. > > That is a big difference. I agree, and would welcome a BCP document pointing out this distinction and explaining why the later is harmful. Banning publication of technologies a priori (as I argue elsewhere) wont stop the technology being developed, wont stop the practice and just leads to the IETF abdicating it role as a meeting point for technical innovation. - peterd
Re: recommendation against publication of draft-cerpa-necp-0
Peter Deutsch in Mountain View Sat, 08 Apr 2000 12:06:30 -0700
- RE: recommendation against publication of d... Michael B. Bellopede
- Re: recommendation against publication... Peter Deutsch
- Re: recommendation against publica... Patrik Fältström
- Re: recommendation against publica... Joe Touch
- RE: recommendation against publication... Michael B. Bellopede
- Peter Deutsch in Mountain View