At 05:38 PM 4/21/2000 -0400, Keith Moore wrote: >doesn't this require the NAT to use the same inside<->outside address >binding for the connection between the client and the KDC as for >the connection between the client and the application server? >e.g. it seems like the NAT could easily change address bindings >during the lifetime of a ticket. Yup, so far I have always been able to work around this by opening up an SSL IMAP connection to remote server to stablize the address while I need to do other work. Oh the fun games we encounter when mixing security and NATs :) Paul
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt J. Noel Chiappa
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt Keith Moore
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt Pyda Srisuresh
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt Pyda Srisuresh
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt Pyda Srisuresh
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt Greg Hudson
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.... Keith Moore
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications... Bill Sommerfeld
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications... Greg Hudson
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complicat... Keith Moore
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications... Paul B. Hill
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt Jeffrey Altman
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt Jeffrey Altman
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt J. Noel Chiappa
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt Masataka Ohta
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt Theodore Y. Ts'o
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.... Keith Moore
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt Thomas Narten
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt Pyda Srisuresh
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt Henning Schulzrinne
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.... Jon Crowcroft