Daniel Senie wrote: > > Ian King wrote: > > > >From the reports I read, this was implemented by mapping phone numbers > to some other tag (which the user doesn't see) which is used to get the > calls to the proper carrier and ultimately to the proper user. > > Sounds a whole lot like using DNS to map names to IP addresses. Of > course we expose users to IP addresses WAY too often, and overuse them > in applications as well, for this analogy to be really workable for the > Internet. It might also sound like another level of indirection would be useful. DNS -> IP is sometimes difficult to manage because both can change. It would be useful to have an ID that had nothing to do with either, allowing renumbering and renaming without losing that pointer. E.g. DNS <-> ID <-> IP Joe
- Re: IPv6: Past mistakes repeated? Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: IPv6: Past mistakes repeated? Anthony Atkielski
- Re: IPv6: Past mistakes repeated? Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: IPv6: Past mistakes repeated? Anthony Atkielski
- Re: IPv6: Past mistakes repeated? Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: IPv6: Past mistakes repeated? John Stracke
- RE: IPv6: Past mistakes repeated? Ian King
- Re: IPv6: Past mistakes repeated? Daniel Senie
- Re: IPv6: Past mistakes repeated? Richard Shockey
- Re: IPv6: Past mistakes repeated? Keith Moore
- Re: IPv6: Past mistakes repeated? Joe Touch
- Re: IPv6: Past mistakes repeated? John Stracke
- Re: IPv6: Past mistakes repeated? Thomas Narten
- runumbering (was: Re: IPv6: Past mistakes... Paul Francis
- Re: runumbering (was: Re: IPv6: Past ... Steve Deering
- Re: runumbering (was: Re: IPv6: Past m... Keith Moore
- Re: runumbering (was: Re: IPv6: Past m... Thomas Narten
- Re: runumbering (was: Re: IPv6: P... Paul Francis
- Re: IPv6: Past mistakes repeated? Anthony Atkielski
- Re: IPv6: Past mistakes repeated? Kai Henningsen
- Re: IPv6: Past mistakes repeated? Leonid Yegoshin