Anthony Atkielski wrote: > > > I agree! Why create a finite anything when an infinite > > possibility exists? > > Exactly. If you designed an open-ended protocol, you're far less likely to > ever have to rewrite it. PS - that's what we have version numbers for. Open-ended can sometimes mean "you never know when you're exercising (exorcising) new code" too. Joe
- RE: IPv6: Past mistakes repeated? David A Higginbotham
- RE: IPv6: Past mistakes repeated? Peter Johansson
- RE: IPv6: Past mistakes repeated? Dick St.Peters
- Re: IPv6: Past mistakes repeated? Anthony Atkielski
- Re: IPv6: Past mistakes repeated? Ralph Droms
- Re: IPv6: Past mistakes repeated? Valdis . Kletnieks
- RE: IPv6: Past mistakes repeated? Joe Touch
- RE: IPv6: Past mistakes repeated? Manish R. Shah.
- Re: IPv6: Past mistakes repeated? Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: IPv6: Past mistakes repeated? Anthony Atkielski
- Re: IPv6: Past mistakes repeated? Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: IPv6: Past mistakes repeated? Anthony Atkielski
- Re: IPv6: Past mistakes repeate... Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: IPv6: Past mistakes repeate... John Stracke
- RE: IPv6: Past mistakes repeated? Ian King
- Re: IPv6: Past mistakes repeated? Daniel Senie
- Re: IPv6: Past mistakes repeated? Richard Shockey