Craig,
From RFC 1287:
"If I could PING you, and you could PING me, then we were both on the
Internet, and a satisfying working definition of the Internet could
be constructed as a roughly transitive closure of IP-speaking
systems. This model of the Internet was simple, uniform, and -
perhaps most important - testable. The IP-connectivity model clearly
distinguished systems that were "on the Internet" from those that
were not."
In the same RFC, we proposed a different answer to your "what *IS*
the Internet?" question, based not on IP (network address)
connectivity but on the shared domain name space managed by DNS -
"the Internet" consists of entities nameable within the DNS, however
they may be interconnected by underlying networks.
- Lyman
At 1:43 AM -0400 7/8/00, Craig Simon wrote:
>Eric Brunner wrote:
> > Anyone else with a normative legal reference, your favorite
>...
>
>I saw this in someone's sig line.
>
>But what *IS* the internet?
>
>It's the largest equivalence class in the reflexive transitive symmetric
>closure of the relationship "can be reached by an IP packet from".
>--Seth Breidbart
>
>
>cls
>
>-
>This message was passed through [EMAIL PROTECTED], which
>is a sublist of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Not all messages are passed.
>Decisions on what to pass are made solely by Harald Alvestrand.
