Bob; > *> but yes, likely some things in this world are not acceptable to some > *> segment of the population. so don't accept them. but life goes on and > *> things change. > *> > *> randy Changes are already implied by RC1958, which I refer. As things change, new RFCs can be issued. > Resist entropy. You can't. Entropy and the number of RFCs monotonically increase. Masataka Ohta
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt Vernon Schryver
- RE: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt BookIII, Robert
- RE: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt Vernon Schryver
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt J. Noel Chiappa
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt Keith Moore
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt Masataka Ohta
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt John Stracke
- RE: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt Bob Braden
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt Masataka Ohta
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt Greg Skinner
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt Masataka Ohta
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt Vernon Schryver
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt Keith Moore
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt Vernon Schryver
- precedence field and mailing lists Keith Moore
- AOL and standards Keith Moore
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt Greg Skinner
- AOL's view of the Net versus the rest Anthony Atkielski
- Re: AOL's view of the Net versus the rest Valdis . Kletnieks