Masataka Ohta wrote: > If IETF makes it clear that AOL is not an ISP, it will commercially > motivate AOL to be an ISP. Why? Certainly, they are aware that they are not an ISP by your definition. It hasn't changed their business practices. Why would an IETF RFC change their business practices? The business practices of AOL are determined, for the most part, by what Wall Street and their customers think is important, not what the IETF thinks. Most of their customers are unlikely to read such an RFC anyway. --gregbo
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt Greg Skinner
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt Masataka Ohta
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt Vernon Schryver
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt Keith Moore
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt Vernon Schryver
- precedence field and mailing lists Keith Moore
- AOL and standards Keith Moore
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt Greg Skinner
- AOL's view of the Net versus the rest Anthony Atkielski
- Re: AOL's view of the Net versus the rest Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt Greg Skinner
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt Eli Sanchez
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt Robert G. Ferrell
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt Greg Skinner
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt John Stracke