"Rakers, Jason" wrote: > > Better question: How many households are there in the world on the > Internet? Wrong question. The correct question is how many should we plan for. Right now 12 billion people seems to be a reasoanble estimate - unthinkable for IPv4, but easily covered by IPv6. Brian
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! Måns Nilsson
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! Andre-John Mas
- RE: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! R A Lichtensteiger
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! Keith Moore
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! Anthony Atkielski
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! Steven Cotton
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! Steve Deering
- RE: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! Evstiounin, Mikhail
- RE: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! Parkinson, Jonathan
- RE: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! Rakers, Jason
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! Jon Crowcroft
- RE: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! Dawson, Peter D
- RE: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! Tim Salo
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! Keith Moore
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! Robert Elz
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! vinton g. cerf
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! Rick H Wesson
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! Bob Hinden
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! Anthony Atkielski
- RE: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! Dawson, Peter D