> From: Masataka Ohta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >... > > If you want phone with real Internet style, see our INET paper: > > http://www.isoc.org/inet2000/cdproceedings/4a/4a_3.htm Excellent! That is far better than any IP telephony proposal I've ever seen. > Run this kind of protocol over Ricochet terminal and WAP and iMODE > will disapper. Well, Ricochet doesn't have a tenth the coverage that digital cellular does, at least around here: http://www.ricochet.com/about_us/coverage_maps/index.html But if Ricochet integrated Simple Internet Phone in their tranceivers, the demand would probably allow them to expand their coverage fast and far, which would be great. > You can purchase a prototype terminal adapter. Please tell me how. I want a few. Cheers, James
- Re: imode far superior to wap Renfield Kuroda
- Re: imode far superior to wap John Stracke
- Re: imode far superior to wap Masataka Ohta
- Re: imode far superior to w... John Stracke
- Re: imode far superior to wap Steven Cotton
- Re: imode far superior to wap Francis Dupont
- Re: imode far superior to wap Masataka Ohta
- Re: imode far superior to wap Masataka Ohta
- Re: imode far superior to wap Måns Nilsson
- Re: imode far superior to wap Masataka Ohta
- RE: imode far superior to wap James P. Salsman
- RE: imode far superior to wap Brijesh Kumar
- RE: imode far superior to wap John Day
- Re: imode far superior to wap George Michaelson
- RE: imode far superior to wap Shaw, Robert
- RE: imode far superior to wap Barathy, RamaSubramaniam
- RE: imode far superior to wap Steven Cotton
- RE: imode far superior to wap vinton g. cerf
- Re: imode far superior to wap James P. Salsman