At 00/09/20 14:34 +0900, Lee, Jiwoong wrote: >Dear all > >What do you think about "de facto" that many technical documents >are currently using Internet Drafts as referece material? > >I've seen next two cases: >1. An Internet Draft refers to another Internet Draft. >2. A book refers to another Internet Draft. > >I'm not sure of the next case. Any body observed this? >3. An RFC refers to an Internet Draft. > >Hereby I'd like to ask your opinion, esp. on no.1 >Is it legitimate? no. 1 is really needed. There is no problem with it, you just include '(work in progress)' in the citation. Regards, Martin.
- An Internet Draft as reference material Lee, Jiwoong
- RE: An Internet Draft as reference material Martin J. Duerst
- RE: An Internet Draft as reference material Tim Moors
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material Grenville Armitage
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material Harald Alvestrand
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material Masataka Ohta
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material Magnus Danielson
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material Jon Crowcroft
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material Bob Braden
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material Charles E. Perkins
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material Bob Braden