Eliot;

> I would accept your interpretation if you can go to a major search engine,
> like Yahoo or Altavista, and find me in a brief period of time ANY version
> of Mike O'Dell's 8+8 proposal.

You should really check archive of a big internet mailing list (does
someone know where it is archived?) for various 8+8 proposals
(including mine), some of which was available as IDs (thus, archive of
expired IDs are useful).

Mike's is the latest but the least useful one.

> Don't you think it shameful that there is
> no permanent record about a serious effort to deal with a serious problem
> (multihoming)?  And this is a recent (read: current) problem!

Handling of multihoming in Mike's draft is very old (even at the time
of his proposal) one.

As is briefly explained in <draft-ohta-e2e-multihoming-00.txt>, the
method violates the end to end principle and does not scale.

                                                        Masataka Ohta

Reply via email to