I don't think the issue is "weight" as much as it is the rights to intellectual property contained within the I-D (and here I mean intellectual property in the most general sense of the term so as to include copyrights and also other intellectual property rights). At least that's where a good deal of the discussion seems to have centered. vint At 09:06 AM 10/1/2000 -0700, Melinda Shore wrote: >There seems to be specific concern that if it were >the IETF archiving expired drafts it might be seen >as giving those documents some weight. But what if >some other body or organization were to do the same >thing?
- Re: Topic drift Re: An Internet Draft as reference m... Hal Murray
- Re: Topic drift Re: An Internet Draft as reference m... Bill Manning
- Re: Topic drift Re: An Internet Draft as reference m... Eric Brunner-Williams
- Re: Topic drift Re: An Internet Draft as refere... Mohsen BANAN-Public
- Re: Topic drift Re: An Internet Draft as reference m... Grenville Armitage
- Re: Topic drift Re: An Internet Draft as reference m... Bill Manning
- Re: Topic drift Re: An Internet Draft as refere... Grenville Armitage
- Re: Topic drift Re: An Internet Draft as reference m... Melinda Shore
- Re: Topic drift Re: An Internet Draft as reference m... Robert Elz
- Re: Topic drift Re: An Internet Draft as reference m... vint cerf
- Re: Topic drift Re: An Internet Draft as reference m... Melinda Shore
- Re: Topic drift Re: An Internet Draft as reference m... vint cerf
- Re: Topic drift Re: An Internet Draft as reference m... Bob Braden
- Re: Topic drift Re: An Internet Draft as refere... Henning Schulzrinne
- Re: Topic drift Re: An Internet Draft as refere... Kent Crispin
- Re: Topic drift Re: An Internet Draft as reference m... Mike_Borella
- Re: Topic drift Re: An Internet Draft as reference m... Vernon Schryver