<<On Sun, 01 Oct 2000 20:12:55 -0400, Keith Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > on the other hand, (and IMHO) making the I-D series permanently archived > will discourage folks from tossing out half-baked ideas and trying to > get others to improve on them; The I-D series already *is* permanently, publicly archived (just not by the IETF). This does not seem to have discouraged a good number of half-baked ideas (including my own miniscule contribution). I am fairly certain that I have seen an I-D mirror which was configured not to ever delete or even modify a file once retrieved. (This would be fairly trivial to do in `mirror'.) -GAWollman
- Re: Topic drift Re: An Internet Draft as reference mat... vint cerf
- Re: Topic drift Re: An Internet Draft as reference mat... Bob Braden
- Re: Topic drift Re: An Internet Draft as referenc... Henning Schulzrinne
- Re: Topic drift Re: An Internet Draft as referenc... Kent Crispin
- Re: Topic drift Re: An Internet Draft as reference mat... Mike_Borella
- Re: Topic drift Re: An Internet Draft as reference mat... Vernon Schryver
- Re: Topic drift Re: An Internet Draft as reference mat... Keith Moore
- Re: Topic drift Re: An Internet Draft as reference mat... Garrett Wollman
- Re: Topic drift Re: An Internet Draft as reference mat... Keith Moore
- Re: Topic drift Re: An Internet Draft as referenc... Garrett Wollman
- Re: Topic drift Re: An Internet Draft as reference mat... John C Klensin