At 10:47 -0700 10/18/00, James P. Salsman wrote:
>Klass,
>
>Thanks for your reply:
>
> >> Is there any compelling reason why wireless IP needs to
> >> be "mobile" in the sense of traversing networks?
> >
> > yes, I don't want to pay my expensive cellular operator when near a
> > wireless LAN access point.
>
>That's a good reason, but it doesn't require such a drastic solution.
>
>I would rather have one address for a wireless WAN interface and
>another address for a wireless LAN interface -- which seems to be
>doable today -- much more than I want to wait for the solution
>with "Mobile IP" address traversal to become commercially available.
No, what you want is a serial number. Or at least what you describe
is a serial number. An address is very different.
Take care,
John
