>> > The host *is* the edge of the network. >> >> I'm sorry to have not mentioned that I consider the host nodes, >> or the end nodes, are not edges but instead something attaching >> on network edges. I consider the very last hub, or the access router >> which the end nodes connected to as the 'network edge'. > So there's no network between me and another computer on the > same unswitched Ethernet? For example the old 10Base2 ethernet links? Or a cross-link twisted-pairs? I can say the full length of the 10Base2 link can be regarded as a (passive) repeater hub. I think 'network edge' is somewhat a arbitrary definition. Maybe I'm not correct but I believe distinguishing 'network edge' from 'end node' may provide some convenience for further discussion on the congestion control and avoidance mechanism.
- RE: An alternative to TCP (part 1) aaron
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1) Richard Carlson
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1) John Stracke
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1) Bob Braden
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1) Keith Moore
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1) Mark Allman
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1) Kevin Farley
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1) John Stracke
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1) Mahadevan Iyer
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1) Richard Carlson
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1) Jun'an Gao
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1) Jun'an Gao
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1) Jun'an Gao
- RE: An alternative to TCP (part 1) Larry Foore
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1) joaquin . riverarodriguez
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1) Jun'an Gao
- RE: An alternative to TCP (part 1) Iliff, Tina
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1) tytso
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1) Randall R. Stewart
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1) Jun'an Gao
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1) Randall R. Stewart