[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The problem is that when you take *that* stuff into account, I've spent
> (or have committed to spending) *more* time trying to comply with the
> GPL than I have actually making useful things available.
OK, I am convinced that GPL creates problems, especially
for the maintainers. Now, back to the original issue that
I have raised, i.e. IESG's assertions on:
Doing so, according to our counsel '...is as close to a
"contribution to the public" that we can get'.
Is that really true that the BCP-9 text was developed by the
IETF (not ISOC!) lawyers specifically to deal with IETF documents?
Furthermore, (AFAIK) haven't these counsels also recommended
that "Foo of Conduct" modification? I just put the GDL as a
comparison.
regards,
--
Rahmat M. Samik-Ibrahim - VLSM-TJT - http://rms46.vlsm.org
--- The Kappa likes getting cucumber --- Budum... Budum...