Aidan Williams wrote: [..] > To extend the analogy again in the opposite direction: now that > software is available to tunnel random traffic over HTTP, we can > expect firewall filtering to get harder, and become less effective. > Why would this not happen for email lists too? Most spammers strike me as opportunistic and not overly interested in special-case-handling a couple of subscribe-to-send lists, given the hundreds and thousands of target addresses they purchased on a CDROM. Yes, they could get around pre-subscribe schemes. Yet it seems likely most wouldn't bother, and would instead just end up ignoring us. Which would be nice. cheers, gja
- filtering of mailing lists and NATs Keith Moore
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs grenville armitage
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs grenville armitage
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs Keith Moore
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs grenville armitage
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs grenville armitage
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs Eric Rosen
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs Leo Vegoda
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs Robert Elz
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs Francis Dupont
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs ned . freed
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs grenville armitage
- Social solutions mean lawyers... Re: filtering... grenville armitage