So the actual question is: how do we ensure that ISPs are motivated to charge per /64 for IPv6, rather than charge per /128?
Mandating the availability of RFC 3041 addresses would help. Brian Matt Crawford wrote: > > > It seems to me that these two can't both be true. IP Addresses cannot at > > once be scarce enough to charge for and non-scarce enough that scarcity is > > a non-issue. > > > > Does anyone else see something schizoid about this discussion? > > Not I. I, as an end user or small site, cannot use just any IP > address. Not even any old address that has been properly assigned to > me. I can only use addresses that come from one of my ISP's > aggregates. And with respect to that kind of address, my ISP is a > monopoly supplier.
