List:

U.S. Census data from Feb 19 stress the Internet time warp and
hint at the risk of ignoring it. What is at stake when a RFC is
faulty or not correctly implemented, for example hurting interoperation
or security, grows exponentially in time, and fast.

The Internet broke the 60 percent penetration barrier in the U.S. faster
than any other medium. For example, some 35 percent of the U.S.
population had phone use in 1920, but penetration didn't reach 60
percent until 1950. With the Internet, a comparable increase in
usage only took two years.

Telephone - surpassed 60 percent in 30 years
Cable TV - surpassed 60 percent in 27 years
Computers - surpassed 60 percent in 15 years
Radio - surpassed 60 percent in 10 years
VCR's - surpassed 60 percent in 10 years
Television - surpassed 60 percent in 5 years
Internet - surpassed 60 percent in 2 years

In this scenario, and with all due respect to everyone's opinions,
policies that might have been justifiable some 10 or 15 years ago,
such as laissez-faire interoperation, conformance verification and
trust, cannot be justified by saying "the existing system is quite
effective" or "in doing this for the last 10 years, i've yet to suffer a
mishap because of this..."  What was, aint' any more.

In addition, within the last ten years the Internet has changed radically
from a centrally controlled network to a network of networks -- with no
control point whatsoever.  There is, thus, further reason to doubt the
assertion that what worked ten years ago will work today in the same
way.

Cheers,

Ed Gerck

Reply via email to