Nice work guys! instead of the annoyance of one o-o-o, we've now got a thread discussing it. Marvellous.
(and no, the irony of my reply is not lost) ;) -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Manoj Shrivastava Sent: 21 February 2002 18:20 To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: Carol Bertolet/LIONVILLE/WEST is out of the office. Because out-of-office responder replied to [EMAIL PROTECTED] which is the address of this mailing list. I also got the same message. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 11:32 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FW: Carol Bertolet/LIONVILLE/WEST is out of the office. ok, I'll bite. How did this wind up in my mailbox? NAT or fate?????? BLB From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Subject: FW: Carol Bertolet/LIONVILLE/WEST is out of the office. Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 11:53:50 -0500 I will be out of the office starting 02/21/2002 and will not return until 02/25/2002. I will be out 1/2 day Thursday afternoon and all day Friday. Please contact MIS Customer Support for all computer issues. Carol Bertolet
