--On 17. mars 2002 21:24 +0800 Tim Kehres <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I don't think that I have seen any spam on this or the [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Mailing lists in quite a long time. Ad I can only recall two incidences >> where I have seen any spam on either list. So I guess I am wondering >> why there seems to be a perceived problem with spam on these >> Mailing lists??? > > I've not noticed any spam on either of these lists either For the IETF list, it is because it is being run in the mode recommended (subscribers only + large whitelist). We started doing that a couple of months ago. If you haven't noticed, it must be doing the right thing! Harald
- Re: Guidance for spam-control on IETF mai... James M Galvin
- Re: Guidance for spam-control on IETF... Don McMorris
- Re: Guidance for spam-control on IETF mailing... Keith Moore
- Re: Guidance for spam-control on IETF mai... Christopher Evans
- Re: Guidance for spam-control on IETF mai... grenville armitage
- Re: Guidance for spam-control on IETF... Keith Moore
- Re: Guidance for spam-control on ... grenville armitage
- Re: Guidance for spam-control on IETF... Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: Guidance for spam-control on IETF mai... Jeff Williams
- Re: Guidance for spam-control on IETF... Tim Kehres
- Re: Guidance for spam-control on ... Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: Guidance for spam-control on ... Vernon Schryver
- Re: Guidance for spam-control on ... Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: Guidance for spam-control on ... Bruce Campbell
- Re: Guidance for spam-control on ... Vernon Schryver
- Re: Guidance for spam-control on IETF... Robert Elz
- Re: Guidance for spam-control on ... Vernon Schryver
- Re: Guidance for spam-control on ... Tim Kehres
- Re: Guidance for spam-control on ... Robert Elz
- Re: Guidance for spam-control on ... Robert Elz
- Re: Guidance for spam-control on IETF mailing list... grenville armitage