I know. That wasn't what I was interested in, nor was that the section I quoted. What a guy said WAS of interest. But if folks are going to work themselves up into a froth over it (in particular you), why not just use the <delete> key?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hello James, > > The article that you are pointing to is over a year old. > > The Mobile IPv6 protocol has come a long way since > then. If you follow the progress of the MIPv6 work on > the Mobile IP WG list, you will realize that the WG is > now in the final stages of completing the work on MIPv6. > > -Basavaraj > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Meritt James" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 3:06 PM > > Subject: Article: Mobile security flaw delivers yet another > > blow to IPv6 > > > > > > "The problems with Mobile IPv6 are frustrating for IPv6 proponents, who > > view wireless applications as the likely first adopters of IPv6. This > > frustration was evident at a meeting of the IETF's Mobile IP working > > group, which was held in Minneapolis on March 22. > > > > "It's a setback for those who are eager to get IPv6 out there," says > > Steve Deering, a Cisco engineer who helped design IPv6 and > > serves on the IETF's Internet Architecture Board. "The Mobile IP working group has > > been working on this since 1991. It's been a long process."" > > > > Full article at http://www.nwfusion.com/news/2001/0402mobileip.html > > > > -- > > James W. Meritt CISSP, CISA > > Booz | Allen | Hamilton > > phone: (410) 684-6566 > > > > > > > > -- James W. Meritt CISSP, CISA Booz | Allen | Hamilton phone: (410) 684-6566
