My answer to your question is that I want IETF, ISO and ITU to set nuclear warfare standards, i.e. if for example you see a web site with a standard ISO NW standard you know that it has dispersed critical manpower, inventories, has an alternative transport system, reliable NW capable suppliers and survival capability for dispersed staff. Plus cutting edge IETF protocol implementation. So that I can choose to use the sites the same way I choose ISO 9XXX.
Then Central Banks would be the first to practice those standards.
I am talking from my own experience of what goes on in a city after a mega-terror attack. USA is not prepared for one, some of its cell phone masts have no standy batteries and generators, that would be part of ISO/IETF NW. USA network of mini-nuke detectors may have no power back up.
Nyagudi
My question was to the entire list, and it still has not been
answered.
gja
> ATTACHMENT part 2 message/rfc822
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2003 04:00:24 -0700 (PDT)
From: NM Research <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Emerging Network Usage and Engineering Issues
To: grenville armitage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
At times feel free to insult me privately not on the list. The internet was not made for e-commerce, its mission was to communicate during nuclear warfare.Meanwhile you can wait for the blast - some says some tactical torpedoes may be missing.Nyagudi
grenville armitage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
NM Research <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
[..partially coherent blather deleted..]
And this has *what* to do with the IETF?
gja
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
