Jari

If we have xml in the archive, then there are several tools
that can serve you up your choice of formats from that archive.
I don't think the value of storing the html bits in the archive
is all that much additional value.  One could have a website
that delivered such a thing without storing the html bits.
Such a site would permit the hyperlinking that you are talking
about.  We also avoid heated discussions about what was allowable
in the html, what version of which tools, etc.  This is a contentious
enough issue ("rough consensus and running code" applies, right?),
and making it bigger makes it harder to reach rough consensus.
Let's just do one simple thing -- allow xml, and see how it goes.

Brian

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jari Arkko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 1:28 AM
> To: Michael Thomas
> Cc: Paul Hoffman / IMC; Rosen, Brian; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: Re: A modest proposal - allow the ID repository to hold xml
> 
> 
> Michael Thomas wrote:
> > Paul Hoffman / IMC writes:
> >  > At 1:22 PM -0400 9/2/03, Rosen, Brian wrote:
> >  > >2) Ability to cross reference documents
> >  > 
> >  > That benefit only appears if all, or a significant 
> proportion, of the 
> >  > Internet Drafts are in XML or a similar format. That's 
> not what you 
> >  > proposed.
> > 
> >    It seems to me that a fairly simple hack could be
> >    consed up to generate HTML or whatever for current
> 
> I'd very much like to allow the submission of XML to the
> I-D directories.
> 
> However, in addition I'd like to actually allow the
> submission of HTML, generated by xml2rfc. Why? Because
> I'd really like to browse most drafts through my browser,
> jump to sections,  find the references easily etc. And without
> performing any extra steps by myself.
> 
> (It may be that this is possible via XML as well -- I'm
> not expert in XML so I can't tell if its readily supported
> by everyone's browser without loading lots of DTDs. Does
> someone know?)
> 
> And all of these submission formats should be allowed if
> and only there's a text version to go with it.
> 
> --Jari
> 



Reply via email to