On Mon, 15 Sep 2003, Shelby Moore wrote:
> > I agree with Dean and I think conceptually that ALL existing anti-spam > (that is currently in public domain that I am aware of) is useless and > even harmful as Dean points out (in long run) because they filter things > which are not spam, just sometimes (even if most of time so far) > correlated to spam. I do not think that _all_ anti-spam is useless. Only that some of the less well considered ideas have been harmful. I think that content analysis holds much promise. Only a few years ago, we thought that speaker-independent voice recognition was science fiction. Along similar lines, I think it will be possible for intelligent agents to decide whether email is likely to be interesting to us. --Dean