Deploy both and we can suck it and see... On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 02:15:39PM -0800, Jim Martin wrote: > > On Nov 13, 2003, at 12:46 PM, Randy Bush wrote: > > >>Note that getting 802.11a works even better. > > > >until everybody does, and 'everbody' is twice > >as many people as now > > > > > Actually, no. 802.11a is inherently better for this sort of > environment than 802.11b or 802.11g. Instead of having 3 > non-overlapping channels, it has 8. Also, being at 5G it doesn't > propagate as far as the 2.4G, which for us would be a real win since it > would reduce interference even further. Oh, and you get 54M to share > rather than 11M to boot :-) > > I strongly encourage people to consider bringing 802.11a cards to > future meetings! (Note: Of course, now that I've said that, the future > hosts will decide against deploying it) > > - Jim > IETF 58 NOC > > >
- RE: IETF58 - Network Status Michel Py
- Re: IETF58 - Network Status Perry E.Metzger
- Re: IETF58 - Network Status Randy Bush
- Re: IETF58 - Network Status Joel Jaeggli
- Re: IETF58 - Network Status Perry E.Metzger
- Re: IETF58 - Network Status Simon Leinen
- Re: IETF58 - Network Status Marcus Leech
- Re: IETF58 - Network Stat... Doug Barton
- Re: IETF58 - Network Status shogunx
- Re: IETF58 - Network Status Jim Martin
- Re: IETF58 - Network Status Tim Chown
- Re: IETF58 - Network Status Joel Jaeggli
- Re: IETF58 - Network Status Henk Uijterwaal (RIPE-NCC)
- Re: IETF58 - Network Stat... Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: IETF58 - Network ... Spencer Dawkins
- Re: IETF58 - Network Status Carsten Bormann
- Re: IETF58 - Network Status Iljitsch van Beijnum
- RE: IETF58 - Network Status Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: [58crew] RE: IETF58 - Network Stat... Brett Thorson
- Re: [58crew] RE: IETF58 - Network ... Tim Chown
- RE: IETF58 - Network Status Harald Tveit Alvestrand