--On 30. mars 2004 09:51 -0800 "Paul Hoffman / VPNC" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Requirement on the RFC Editor - doesn't sound unreasonable, but out of scope for this document.
Not really. Currently, when the IESG reviews non-standards-track documents, it makes a decision (or approves a request) for the status. This document puts that decision into the RFC Editor's hands. It would be good to give on-record advice for how the RFC Editor should make that decision, particularly since the recent experiences with making things Experimental are not consistent with the wording in 2026.
it would be good, but that's not the IESG's role .... it is the IAB's.
Ah, good point. Nevermind...
--Paul Hoffman, Director --VPN Consortium