In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Tony Hain" writes: >Sitting here in Seoul, Janet Sun (BII) said this is self-promotion of a >single researcher looking to improve his funding. There is technical >content, but no business content and the service providers are ignoring it >as a waste of time. Think of it as E-164 on steroids. >
Right.
Dear Steven,
This looks as a well planned, polite and intelligent warning. About possible other ways to use/plan the DNS, IPv6, VoIP etc. We probably have to get used to Chinese ways. I read this as "are you sure IPv6.001 numbering plan, IDNA, VoIP and ENUM are Internet Gospel?".
The surprisingly agressive mail of Vint Cerf seems to show he read it that way - at least in part. But is not IANA now "an ICANN function"?
I am sure reading comments from IETF and other mailing lists taught a lot to the IPv9's team (BTW, hello to them!)
jfc
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
