--On Friday, 26 November, 2004 20:08 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 19:16:58 EST, Sam Hartman said: > >> Personally, I do believe that stating some details would help >> me evaluate whether IASA is seperable and would require the >> IETF's consent in order to change the details. I do think >> that requiring IASA keep separate bank accounts is probably >> desirable at the BCP level. > > OK - I admit I've Just Hit Delete on much of this discussion - > but care has to be taken with "separate bank accounts". We > *do* need some way to prevent IASA from separating (either at > their request or ours) and then find out all the money was in > "their" account not "ours".... > > (OK.. maybe I'm just paranoid on that one, having been on the > losing end of a "been there done that" in my personal life. :) This is interesting. Almost all of the discussion about "separate bank accounts", etc., has been focused on "protection of the IASA from ISOC". But you drew the other inference, which I discussed at more length in my "blowing the bolts" note, i.e., that it is at least as likely that the IETF might need protection from the IASA or even, once large amounts of money are involved, from some combination of the IAB, IESG, and IASA. john _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
