--On 13. desember 2004 14:41 +0100 Brian E Carpenter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I did not see anyone speak up in favor of mandating quarterly deposits for an effort that not a quarterly effort yet this sillyness is still in the document
I've gone various ways on this, but I think that imposing a duty of regular payment on ISOC is appropriate - so that paying the IETF late doesn't become a tempting cash-flow management tool. I would be happy with a phrasing that asks for at least 3 payments per year.
I'd suggest some variant of "as budgeted".
Harald
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
