James M. Polk wrote:
I'm initially really surprised 1518/1519 is on this list.
Obviously, it's a bug. Of the Proposed Standards that the Internet runs on, those are among the most important. I believe this was pointed out on the old-standards list already, but it must have got lost.
Brian
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
