*> From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 16 05:23:25 2004 *> Mime-Version: 1.0 *> Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 08:02:44 -0500 *> To: Eliot Lear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, IETF Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> *> From: Margaret Wasserman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> *> X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) *> X-Scan-Signature: ffa9dfbbe7cc58b3fa6b8ae3e57b0aa3 *> Cc: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, *> [EMAIL PROTECTED] *> Subject: Re: [newtrk] List of Old Standards to be retired *> List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org> *> X-ISI-4-32-5-MailScanner: Found to be clean *> X-ISI-4-30-3-MailScanner: Found to be clean *> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham *> version=2.64 *> *> *> >RFC0885 Telnet end of record option *> *> This option was, at least at one time, used for telnet clients that *> connected to IBM mainframes... It was used to indicate the end of a *> 3270 datastream. I don't know if it is still used in that fashion, *> but Bob Moskowitz might know. *>
I don't see that usage matters in the least. The EOR option provides a function that was useful at one time and may be useful again. It is not technically unsound. I don't see any excuse to change the category of this document. Bob Braden (speaking for himself) _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
