I agree with Scott on this one. In-kind contributions are great if they have a real purpose, which in this case it means the folks responsible for deploying the contribution have to agree it is worth the trouble.
Another example is somebody accepting a bunch of equipment for use in the next IETF meeting when the NOC doesn't necessarily need or want that item. Regards, Carl > Margaret asks > > > ISSUE #5: > > > > 6. There shall be a detailed public accounting to separately > > identify all funds available to and all expenditures relating to > > the IETF and to the IASA, including any donations, of funds or > > in-kind, received by ISOC for IETF-related activities. In-kind > > donations shall only be accepted at the direction of the IAD and > > IAOC. > > > > >> What is the purpose of the last line? Is there some fear that > > >> someone would accept inapproprite in-kind donations? What happens > > >> if they do? > > I intended that last line to make it clear that its the IETF (though the > IAD and IAOC) that decides if an in-kind donations is actually something > that the IETF wants and is comfortable with any conditions - for > example someone might be concerned if the ISOC accepted an offer > from Bill' bait & sushi shop to sponsor lunches at IETF with the minor > requirement that an add for BB&SS be appened to all RFCs > > Scott > > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > Ietf@ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf > _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf