<inline> Tom Petch ----- Original Message ----- From: "Larry Masinter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <ietf@ietf.org> Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2005 1:55 AM Subject: Re: Last Call: 'The telnet URI Scheme' to Proposed Standard
> I think it would be much more useful if we could update the > document sufficiently to consider the telnet URI scheme > for Draft Standard or Full Standard. > > The protocol itself meets the qualifications for a full > Standard document; it is widely deployed with multiple independent > implementations and has been quite stable for a long time. > mmmm protocol? Telnet protocol is indeed as you describe but what is a URI? STD66 defines it as an identifier of a resource and allows much flexibility as to the nature of that resource so I see it as part of a namespace which makes these RFC more like an IANA action, cataloging the identifier and its semantics. What constitutes an implementation? A web browser that parses it successfully? Is this even Standards track? I don't know:-( <snip> _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf