There is one paragraph that does talk about licensing, in paragraph 7 of section 3.1, and we can add it there:
It is preferred that Developed Software be provided and licensed for IASA and IETF use in source code form, with no ongoing payments.
No binding promises, but our preference is clear. Makes sense?
--On 11. februar 2005 07:10 -0800 Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote:
In reviewing the IASA BCP I noticed a minor issue:
S 2.2 and 3.1 refer to "perpetual right to use, display, etc." The standard language here typically includes both "royalty-free" (or "fully-paid up") and "irrevocable". I would particularly think we want to specify that no future royalties are due.
-Ekr
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf