--On torsdag, juli 14, 2005 21:33:05 -0400 Sandy Wills <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Directed towards the IESG:
Recording meetings, and publishing those recordings, may be a hassle,
but it answers all questions about the integrity of the decision-making
process. There may still be questions about knowledge and wisdom, but
you put to rest all questions about integrity. Refusing to record (for
whatever reason*), after having been asked (for whatever reason) by the
people you represent, says something rather different.
I'm sorry to be this blunt, but...
Nonsense.
Anyone who has watched the on-stage, recorded, extremely-public board
meetings of ICANN and has also watched the multitude of conspiracy theories
about the ICANN board knows that conspiracy theorists will take the
existence of a recording as proof that the REAL conspiracy was going on
somewhere else, and what was recorded was an orchestrated public charade.
Been there, done that, no cigar.
Harald
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
